Avantages des équipes
Score
6.4
6
Nuke1
Manches gagnées
37
30
Nuke6
Éliminations
237
220
Nuke14
Dégâts
26.26K
24.57K
Nuke1331
Économie
1.36M
1.28M
Nuke67250
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Round rapide (sec)
00:26s01:55s
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Round rapide (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Round rapide (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Score du joueur (round)
38121010
Score du joueur (round)
44811010
Score du joueur (round)
34871010
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Vertigo
51%
Ancient
33%
Nuke
30%
Mirage
L
23%
Inferno
17%
Anubis
11%
Dust II
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Nuke
20%
5
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Inferno
25%
4
0
Anubis
30%
10
0
Dust II
17%
6
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
51%
41
2
Ancient
33%
43
2
Nuke
50%
38
2
Mirage
27%
30
12
Inferno
42%
24
9
Anubis
41%
59
1
Dust II
17%
6
18
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Informations
Match analysis of LOADING vs Preasy by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LOADING and Preasy, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by LOADING. The MVP of this match was Revol.
LOADING analytics
The team LOADING secured 37 out of 67 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Nuke. They also successfully set 11 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LOADING were Revol contributed 57 kills and Jas_x contributed 58 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26264 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LOADING held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Preasy analytics
The team Preasy managed to secure 30 out of 67 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Preasy were AcilioN contributed 54 kills and Griller contributed 43 kills. 24570 of total damage by Preasy could not prevent LOADING from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Preasy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires