0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
6.2
6
Mirage-0.2
Manches gagnées
12
16
Mirage4
Éliminations
97
92
Mirage-5
Dégâts
10.6K
10.06K
Mirage-537
Économie
589K
550.85K
Mirage-38150
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Inferno
100%
Dust II
L
67%
Ancient
L
50%
Nuke
L
30%
Mirage
7%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
0%
1
0
Dust II
67%
3
0
Ancient
100%
2
1
Nuke
80%
5
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Overpass
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
100%
7
1
Dust II
0%
2
2
Ancient
50%
6
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Mirage
57%
7
1
Overpass
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
1
2
Informations
Match analysis of LyP vs FUSION by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LyP and FUSION, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Mirage, and victory was secured by FUSION. The MVP of this match was kun.
FUSION analytics
The team FUSION secured 28 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FUSION were kun contributed 26 kills and guidimon contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10058 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FUSION held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LyP analytics
The team LyP managed to secure 0 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LyP were t9rnay contributed 22 kills and n9xtz contributed 22 kills. 10595 of total damage by LyP could not prevent FUSION from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LyP struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires