0 Commentaires
72
61
17
+11
389
10:10
17
1
Anubis6.3
+7%
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Overpass
65%
Mirage
46%
Ancient
40%
Vertigo
29%
Inferno
16%
Anubis
10%
Nuke
4%
Dernières 5 cartes
Overpass
100%
1
9
Mirage
0%
2
3
Ancient
40%
10
1
Vertigo
25%
4
5
Inferno
29%
7
2
Anubis
60%
10
0
Nuke
55%
11
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Overpass
35%
26
29
Mirage
46%
41
6
Ancient
0%
0
65
Vertigo
54%
24
27
Inferno
45%
29
6
Anubis
70%
40
1
Nuke
59%
39
3
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ggggp
- ggpgp
Informations
Match analysis of L&G vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between L&G and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was simke.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were simke contributed 17 kills and brutmonster contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7775 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
L&G analytics
The team L&G managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for L&G were Malkiss contributed 18 kills and j3kie contributed 19 kills. 6870 of total damage by L&G could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, L&G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires