0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
31.5972
Round rapide (sec)
00:21s01:55s
Round rapide (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Score du joueur (round)
42171010
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Inferno
59%
Dust II
53%
Mirage
50%
Anubis
34%
Train
33%
Nuke
28%
Ancient
7%
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
0%
0
1
Dust II
0%
0
1
Mirage
50%
4
0
Anubis
25%
4
0
Train
0%
0
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Ancient
30%
10
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
59%
44
1
Dust II
53%
51
7
Mirage
0%
1
43
Anubis
59%
63
1
Train
33%
3
7
Nuke
61%
56
4
Ancient
37%
65
11
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Informations
Match analysis of Haspers vs GenOne by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Haspers and GenOne, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by GenOne. The MVP of this match was drac.
GenOne analytics
The team GenOne secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GenOne were drac contributed 16 kills and devoduvek contributed 13 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7232 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GenOne held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Haspers analytics
The team Haspers managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Haspers were Dejluk contributed 15 kills and Dr3nquu contributed 14 kills. 6420 of total damage by Haspers could not prevent GenOne from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Haspers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires