0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
31.3011
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8168
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
41.4516
Dégâts (total/round)
41773
Score du joueur (round)
39361010
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Éliminations au couteau
11
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Inferno
73%
Anubis
64%
Dust II
60%
Vertigo
50%
Ancient
35%
Nuke
3%
Mirage
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
0%
0
1
Anubis
0%
2
0
Dust II
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
29%
7
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Mirage
50%
4
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
73%
41
3
Anubis
64%
53
3
Dust II
60%
25
16
Vertigo
50%
18
32
Ancient
64%
44
7
Nuke
30%
30
11
Mirage
50%
2
52
Informations
Match analysis of Haspers vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Haspers and FAVBET, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by FAVBET. The MVP of this match was Smash.
FAVBET analytics
The team FAVBET secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FAVBET were Smash contributed 24 kills and j3kie contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8950 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Haspers analytics
The team Haspers managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Haspers were AdrieN contributed 17 kills and bajmi contributed 17 kills. 8125 of total damage by Haspers could not prevent FAVBET from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Haspers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires