0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Dust II (M1)
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
69%
Anubis
60%
Dust II
50%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
42%
Inferno
17%
Vertigo
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
69%
13
1
Anubis
60%
15
2
Dust II
0%
1
2
Nuke
50%
2
10
Mirage
42%
12
0
Inferno
33%
9
8
Vertigo
0%
1
4
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pppgg
- ppppp
Informations
Map Analysis of GR vs Kenla Gaming by the Bo3.gg Team
Kenla Gaming on Dust II Analysis
Kenla Gaming demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Kenla Gaming on Dust II were Geneka, who contributed 22 kills, and aisu, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8709 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Kenla Gaming held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GR on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for GR, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GR on Dust II included SALO_MUX, who contributed 17 kills, and Spaceee, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8521 total damage, GR couldn't prevent Kenla Gaming from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, GR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires