0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
41.3055
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Score du joueur (round)
35761012
Tirs (total/round)
8516
Score du joueur (round)
35171012
Tirs (total/round)
10616
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Inferno
78%
Ancient
67%
Nuke
29%
Dust II
22%
Overpass
21%
Vertigo
2%
Mirage
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
78%
18
15
Ancient
67%
15
9
Nuke
69%
32
5
Dust II
55%
29
18
Overpass
71%
28
8
Vertigo
69%
13
31
Mirage
0%
0
56
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
0%
1
5
Ancient
0%
0
6
Nuke
40%
5
1
Dust II
33%
3
2
Overpass
50%
4
2
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Mirage
0%
1
1
Informations
Match analysis of Bravos vs Stone by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Bravos and Stone, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Stone. The MVP of this match was Tuurtle.
Stone analytics
The team Stone secured 19 out of 34 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Stone were fusco contributed 27 kills and naz contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12748 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Stone held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Bravos analytics
The team Bravos managed to secure 15 out of 34 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Bravos were Tuurtle contributed 31 kills and danoco contributed 20 kills. 12503 of total damage by Bravos could not prevent Stone from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Bravos struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires