0 Commentaires
107
108
22
-1
344
17:17
26
0
-3%
avantage aux équipes Nuke (M1)
Records Nuke
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:33s01:23s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:32s01:23s
Tirs à la tête (total/carte)
248
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
246.2912
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
6621.6
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3014.2369
Score du joueur (round)
35831010
Score du joueur (round)
40241010
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of BESTIA vs Bad News Chickens by the Bo3.gg Team
BESTIA on Nuke Analysis
BESTIA demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 19 out of 34 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for BESTIA on Nuke were luchov, who contributed 31 kills, and Noktse, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 11837 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, BESTIA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Bad News Chickens on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Bad News Chickens, as they managed to secure 15 out of 34 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Bad News Chickens on Nuke included desh, who contributed 28 kills, and zede, who added 27 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11682 total damage, Bad News Chickens couldn't prevent BESTIA from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Bad News Chickens struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires