ARCRED Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

33

30

6

+3

59

4:6

10

1

Ancient5.8

6.0

-8%

14

13

2

+1

88

4:2

3

0

Ancient5.8

6.0

+5%

39

31

9

+8

82

9:9

10

2

Ancient7.3

5.8

+9%

5

14

4

-9

51

1:5

1

0

Ancient7.3

5.8

-17%

31

28

7

+3

70

5:5

7

2

Ancient6.8

5.7

-3%

6

10

3

-4

43

1:0

1

0

Ancient6.8

5.7

-19%

33

34

7

-1

69

1:0

7

1

Ancient5.7

5.5

+3%

5

10

2

-5

42

0:0

1

0

Ancient5.7

5.5

-16%

22

39

14

-17

72

1:8

5

1

Ancient3.9

5.0

-9%

10

14

0

-4

67

1:3

2

0

Ancient3.9

5.0

-4%

Total

198

223

54

-25

643

27:38

47

7

Anubis6

5.6

-6%

Insilio Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

MVP

38

31

8

+7

88

8:6

10

0

Ancient7.4

6.7

+11%

37

32

4

+5

73

5:1

9

1

Ancient6.9

6.4

+2%

26

28

12

-2

63

4:4

4

1

Ancient5.4

6.3

-7%

28

32

8

-4

79

4:3

4

0

Ancient5.6

6.1

-2%

30

36

6

-6

76

7:6

8

0

Ancient5.3

5.4

-9%

Total

159

159

38

0

381

28:20

35

2

Anubis6.1

6.2

-1%

SkinClub Worldwide
Avantages des équipes

Cartes

Score

5.6

6.2

Ancient-0.2

Manches gagnées

30

35

Ancient2

Éliminations

198

220

Ancient-5

Dégâts

21.83K

24.6K

Ancient-856

Économie

1.31M

1.35M

Ancient-1500

Enregistrements Match

Record/Temps/Carte

Val/M

Établi par

Adversaire

Éliminations avec AUG en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

82.5765

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Anubis

00:20s01:55s

Dégâts (total/round)

  •  Anubis

50073

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Anubis

43311011

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Anubis

37501011

As du joueur

  •  Anubis

1

Clutch (adversaires)

  •  Anubis

2

Clutch (adversaires)

  •  Anubis

2

Clutch (adversaires)

  •  Anubis

2

Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)

  •  Anubis

00:31s01:26s

Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Choix & interdictions
Overpass
Overpass
Interdiction
Inferno
Inferno
Interdiction
Ancient
Ancient
Choix
Anubis
Anubis
Choix
Mirage
Mirage
Interdiction
Vertigo
Vertigo
Interdiction
Nuke
Nuke
Décideur
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois

Inferno

53%

Anubis

25%

Vertigo

23%

Mirage

15%

Nuke

8%

Ancient

1%

Dernières 5 cartes

Inferno

53%

15

6

p
g
g
p
p

Anubis

42%

19

6

p
p
fb
g
g

Vertigo

69%

16

3

g
p
g
g
g

Mirage

60%

20

9

fb
p
p
g
g

Nuke

55%

11

9

g
g
p
g
p

Ancient

57%

14

10

g
g
p
g
fb

Dernières 5 cartes

Inferno

0%

0

25

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Anubis

67%

21

1

g
g
p
g
g

Vertigo

46%

13

3

g
p
g
p
p

Mirage

45%

11

6

p
fb
g
g
p

Nuke

47%

15

3

g
p
p
g
g

Ancient

56%

16

9

g
p
g
g
fb
Derniers résultats
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of ARCRED vs Insilio by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between ARCRED and Insilio, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Anubis, Ancient, and victory was secured by ARCRED. The MVP of this match was Pipw.


ARCRED analytics

The team ARCRED secured 30 out of 65 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Ancient. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.


The standout players for ARCRED were DSSj contributed 33 kills and DSSj contributed 14 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21829 overall damage.


On the defensive side, ARCRED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


Insilio analytics

The team Insilio managed to secure 35 out of 65 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for Insilio were Pipw contributed 38 kills and sugaR contributed 37 kills. 18265 of total damage by Insilio could not prevent ARCRED from securing the victory


On the defensive side, Insilio struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date