Inferno
10 - 13
ALTERNATE aTTaX Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

19

17

7

+2

88

0:1

5

0

Inferno6.8

6.8

+16%

20

15

1

+5

69

2:2

5

1

Inferno6.5

6.5

+9%

12

16

9

-4

77

2:3

4

0

Inferno5.9

5.9

-9%

13

19

9

-6

77

2:5

3

0

Inferno5.7

5.7

-6%

12

16

4

-4

57

1:5

2

0

Inferno5.2

5.2

-14%

Total

76

83

30

-7

368

7:16

19

1

Inferno6

6.0

-1%

kONO Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

22

16

4

+6

103

3:1

5

0

Inferno7.7

7.7

+15%

17

14

2

+3

76

2:2

6

3

Inferno7.3

7.3

+5%

15

19

5

-4

69

6:0

3

1

Inferno6.5

6.5

-11%

15

15

7

0

73

4:3

3

0

Inferno6.3

6.3

0%

13

13

2

0

70

1:1

3

2

Inferno6.3

6.3

+2%

Total

82

77

20

+5

390

16:7

20

6

Inferno6.8

6.8

+2%

score predict & Analytics Insights
1 - 0
Résultat
0 - 1
Avantages des équipes

Cartes

Score

6

6.8

Inferno0.8

Manches gagnées

10

13

Inferno3

Éliminations

76

83

Inferno7

Dégâts

8.46K

8.96K

Inferno506

Économie

467.1K

461.75K

Inferno-5350

Enregistrements Match

Record/Temps/Carte

Val/M

Établi par

Adversaire

Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte

  •  Inferno

41.3014

Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte

  •  Inferno

51.4482

Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte

  •  Inferno

51.8164

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Inferno

00:25s01:55s

Dégâts (total/round)

  •  Inferno

40073

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Inferno

35881010

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Inferno

35971010

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Inferno

34941010

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Inferno

35731010

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Inferno

37991010

Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
  • Titulaire

  • Titulaire

  • Titulaire

  • Titulaire

  • Titulaire

Il n'y a actuellement aucune composition d'équipe
Choix & interdictions

Il n'y a actuellement aucune information liée à ce choix de cartes
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois

Mirage

28%

Dust II

22%

Ancient

16%

Anubis

7%

Vertigo

4%

Inferno

1%

Nuke

0%

Dernières 5 cartes

Mirage

25%

28

34

fb
g
p
fb
p

Dust II

50%

12

6

p
g
p
g
g

Ancient

40%

43

26

p
g
p
g
p

Anubis

54%

61

1

g
g
g
p
p

Vertigo

51%

37

7

g
p
p
g
p

Inferno

60%

43

3

p
g
g
g
g

Nuke

0%

5

50

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Dernières 5 cartes

Mirage

53%

19

6

g
g
p
g
p

Dust II

72%

29

0

p
g
p
p

Ancient

56%

25

6

g
p
g
p
g

Anubis

47%

32

7

p
g
g
p
p

Vertigo

47%

15

10

g
p
p
p
p

Inferno

61%

23

0

p
p
p
p
g

Nuke

0%

0

24

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Les équipes ne se sont pas rencontrées au cours des 6 derniers mois
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between ALTERNATE aTTaX and kONO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by kONO. The MVP of this match was kensizor.


kONO analytics

The team kONO secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.


The standout players for kONO were kensizor contributed 22 kills and Polbandana contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8964 overall damage.


On the defensive side, kONO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


ALTERNATE aTTaX analytics

The team ALTERNATE aTTaX managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX were FreeZe contributed 19 kills and PerX contributed 20 kills. 8458 of total damage by ALTERNATE aTTaX could not prevent kONO from securing the victory


On the defensive side, ALTERNATE aTTaX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date