AGO Tableau des résultats Inferno (M2)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

23

13

6

+10

123

5:2

5

0

8.2

+52%

17

12

2

+5

90

5:1

4

0

7.3

+23%

18

8

4

+10

66

2:2

5

3

7.1

+15%

17

12

5

+5

78

0:1

5

0

6.4

+17%

10

13

7

-3

76

1:2

1

1

5.8

-12%

Total

85

58

24

+27

433

13:8

20

4

7.0

+19%

Conquer Tableau des résultats Inferno (M2)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

15

18

3

-3

85

1:2

2

0

6.2

+9%

14

18

2

-4

65

0:0

3

0

5.9

-8%

13

17

2

-4

65

2:1

4

0

5.8

-16%

10

18

3

-8

50

3:7

1

1

4.8

-20%

5

18

2

-13

43

2:3

0

0

4.2

-40%

Total

57

89

12

-32

308

8:13

10

1

5.4

-15%

avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Informations
Map Analysis of AGO vs Conquer by the Bo3.gg Team

AGO on Inferno Analysis

AGO demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AGO on Inferno were Furlan, who contributed 23 kills, and phr, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9086 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Conquer on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Conquer, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Conquer on Inferno included Choco, who contributed 15 kills, and Jelo, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6472 total damage, Conquer couldn't prevent AGO from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Conquer struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date