0 Commentaires
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Pourcentage de tirs à la tête
45%15%
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
12.73.4
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
136.732
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
62.525.3
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1715.0371
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
51.616
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
14.44.6
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
44.516.7
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8064
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
5530
Informations
Map Analysis of 500 vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team
AGO on Dust II Analysis
AGO demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 15 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for AGO on Dust II were leman, who contributed 17 kills, and snatchie, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8026 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
500 on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for 500, as they managed to secure 3 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for 500 on Dust II included SHiPZ, who contributed 16 kills, and Rainwaker, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6398 total damage, 500 couldn't prevent AGO from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, 500 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires