LOUD Anzeigetafel

+/-

KARTEN ACS

SovaFadeBreach

54

43

21

+11

148

9:7

12

0

Ascent210

238

+10%

Cypher

56

42

15

+14

146

7:3

17

0

Ascent201

232

+2%

JettGekko

52

42

9

+10

132

5:8

12

1

Ascent269

205

+6%

KAY/ONeon

39

53

28

-14

128

11:10

10

1

Ascent273

192

-6%

Omen

40

39

20

+1

118

2:4

8

4

Ascent208

163

+4%

Gesamt

241

219

93

+22

672

34:32

59

6

Ascent232

206

+3%

MIBR Anzeigetafel

+/-

KARTEN ACS

KilljoyViperCypher

47

48

16

-1

143

7:10

11

0

Ascent156

210

+2%

JettRaze

45

59

9

-14

139

17:14

11

0

Ascent149

206

0%

KAY/OKilljoyBreach

47

44

22

+3

131

2:4

13

1

Ascent189

200

+6%

SovaFadeGekko

44

51

9

-7

134

5:5

5

1

Ascent190

191

-6%

Omen

36

39

18

-3

105

1:1

10

2

Ascent198

156

+8%

Gesamt

219

241

74

-22

652

32:34

50

4

Ascent176

192

+2%

SkinClub Worldwide
Aufstellungen
Aufstellung
Aufstellung
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Die Teams haben sich in den letzten 6 Monaten nicht getroffen
Vergangene Spiele
Teams Vorteil

Karten

ACS

206

192

Ascent56

Runden

37

29

Ascent6

Tötungen

241

219

Ascent28

Schaden

44.36K

43.06K

Ascent3085

Ökonomie

1.2M

1.12M

Ascent84650

Info
Match analysis of LOUD vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team

In the Valorant match between LOUD and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Ascent, Lotus, Sunset, and victory was secured by LOUD. The MVP of this match was cauanzin.


LOUD analytics

The team LOUD secured 37 out of 66 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ascent, Sunset. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.


The standout players for LOUD were cauanzin contributed 54 kills and Less contributed 56 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 44364 overall damage.


On the defensive side, LOUD held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


MIBR analytics

The team MIBR managed to secure 29 out of 66 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for MIBR were artziN contributed 47 kills and Palla contributed 45 kills. 43065 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent LOUD from securing the victory


On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum