Zero Tenacity Anzeigetafel Nuke (M3)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

13

6

6

+7

136

4:1

2

0

8.5

+48%

16

2

2

+14

94

1:0

6

0

8.4

+64%

15

3

1

+12

99

4:1

5

0

8.2

+51%

10

4

2

+6

81

1:0

2

0

6.7

+25%

7

9

4

-2

78

1:0

0

0

5.6

0%

Gesamt

61

24

15

+37

488

11:2

15

0

7.5

+38%

PGE Turow Anzeigetafel Nuke (M3)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

8

10

1

-2

88

1:1

3

0

6.3

-2%

6

13

1

-7

64

0:0

1

0

4.9

-35%

7

12

1

-5

49

0:4

2

0

4.1

-24%

2

13

3

-11

30

1:3

1

0

3.3

-53%

1

13

3

-12

31

0:3

0

0

2.7

-60%

Gesamt

24

61

9

-37

262

2:11

7

0

4.3

-35%

Teamvorteil Nuke (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs PGE Turow by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Nuke Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 14 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Nuke were nEMANHA, who contributed 13 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 6339 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


PGE Turow on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for PGE Turow, as they managed to secure 1 out of 14 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for PGE Turow on Nuke included Bielany, who contributed 8 kills, and Markoś, who added 6 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3401 total damage, PGE Turow couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, PGE Turow struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum