0 Kommentare
74
49
24
+25
436
9:9
17
0
+19%
Teamvorteil Inferno (M1)
Datensätze Inferno
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
AK47 Kills auf der Karte
176.5019
AK47 Schaden (avg/round)
81.625.2
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
1614.5022
HE Schaden (avg/round)
19.13.4
Molotov Schaden (avg/round)
7.72.1
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
1714.5022
Prozentsatz der Kopfschüsse
41%15%
M4A1 Kills auf der Karte
94.4189
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
1614.5022
HE Schaden (avg/round)
13.83.4
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Metizport by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno were Cjoffo, who contributed 19 kills, and brutmonster, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7853 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Metizport on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Metizport, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Metizport on Inferno included Adamb, who contributed 20 kills, and Plopski, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5908 total damage, Metizport couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Metizport struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare