0 Kommentare
64
44
20
+20
432
11:5
15
2
+18%
Teamvorteil Anubis (M2)
Datensätze Anubis
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:33s01:25s
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:31s01:25s
Deagle Schaden (avg/round)
26.65.3
AK47 Kills auf der Karte
106.5019
M4A1 Kills auf der Karte
94.4189
M4A1 Schaden (avg/round)
7016.3
USP Kills auf der Karte
31.6027
USP Schaden (avg/round)
18.74.8
Galil Kills auf der Karte
41.8164
Galil Schaden (avg/round)
215.9
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were aVN, who contributed 17 kills, and brutmonster, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 6919 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
EYEBALLERS on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for EYEBALLERS, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Anubis included HEAP, who contributed 14 kills, and JW, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5216 total damage, EYEBALLERS couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare