0 Kommentare
50
28
13
+22
428
11:1
12
0
+25%
Teamvorteil Inferno (M2)
Datensätze Inferno
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
GLOCK Kills auf der Karte
21.4456
Galil Kills auf der Karte
31.8171
Galil Schaden (avg/round)
20.15.8
AK47 Kills auf der Karte
96.5888
AK47 Schaden (avg/round)
64.925.3
GLOCK Kills auf der Karte
31.4456
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
264
Molotov Kills auf der Karte
11.0811
AWP Kills auf der Karte
86.4849
AWP Schaden (avg/round)
6821.7
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 9 out of 12 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno were aVN, who contributed 15 kills, and brutmonster, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 5139 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
EYEBALLERS on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EYEBALLERS, as they managed to secure 3 out of 12 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Inferno included Peppzor, who contributed 8 kills, and flusha, who added 7 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3438 total damage, EYEBALLERS couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare