0 Kommentare
103
89
31
+14
391
14:15
28
1
+7%
Teamvorteil Inferno (M3)
Datensätze Inferno
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:28s01:25s
HE Schaden (avg/round)
16.93.4
HE Schaden (avg/round)
19.93.4
Molotov Schaden (avg/round)
9.72.1
Galil Schaden (avg/round)
17.65.9
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
2714.5022
HE Tötungen auf der Karte
31.121
Schüsse (total/round)
8316
Spieler Punktzahl (round)
39461010
Schüsse (total/round)
9516
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs ECSTATIC by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno were brutmonster, who contributed 28 kills, and aVN, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11341 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ECSTATIC on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ECSTATIC, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ECSTATIC on Inferno included Anlelele, who contributed 23 kills, and nut nut, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9558 total damage, ECSTATIC couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, ECSTATIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare