ECLOT Anzeigetafel Anubis (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

19

16

4

+3

92

1:0

5

0

7.0

+18%

8

15

3

-7

57

1:2

1

0

4.7

-26%

10

15

4

-5

54

0:4

2

1

4.6

-24%

9

17

2

-8

62

0:5

2

0

4.4

-29%

5

18

5

-13

67

1:5

0

0

4.2

-37%

Gesamt

51

81

18

-30

332

3:16

10

1

5.0

-19%

Zero Tenacity Anzeigetafel Anubis (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

22

9

3

+13

104

6:0

8

0

8.8

+43%

18

9

8

+9

99

1:1

4

0

7.2

+40%

17

10

4

+7

86

2:1

3

1

6.9

+25%

11

11

5

0

82

4:1

1

0

6.3

0%

13

12

4

+1

61

3:0

2

0

6.2

+3%

Gesamt

81

51

24

+30

432

16:3

18

1

7.1

+22%

Teamvorteil Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of ECLOT vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were brutmonster, who contributed 22 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8203 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ECLOT on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for ECLOT, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ECLOT on Anubis included Blytz, who contributed 19 kills, and kreaz, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6316 total damage, ECLOT couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum