Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Dust II
53%
Anubis
53%
Vertigo
13%
Mirage
11%
Inferno
9%
Nuke
9%
Ancient
6%
Letzte 5 Karten
Dust II
0%
1
56
Anubis
53%
30
5
Vertigo
68%
28
2
Mirage
66%
35
10
Inferno
47%
17
25
Nuke
44%
34
25
Ancient
67%
30
11
Letzte 5 Karten
Dust II
53%
17
29
Anubis
0%
0
65
Vertigo
55%
22
13
Mirage
55%
40
9
Inferno
56%
27
14
Nuke
53%
32
17
Ancient
73%
33
14
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Info
Map Analysis of Sharks vs Fluxo by the Bo3.gg Team
Sharks on Mirage Analysis
Sharks demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Sharks on Mirage were , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Fluxo on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for Fluxo, as they managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Fluxo on Mirage included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, Fluxo couldn't prevent Sharks from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, Fluxo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare