Sangal Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

18

21

3

-3

90

6:3

4

0

6.6

-6%

16

18

3

-2

79

2:2

5

0

5.9

-3%

17

17

1

0

72

1:2

4

0

5.8

-6%

10

16

2

-6

57

0:1

2

0

4.8

-17%

8

19

2

-11

37

2:4

2

0

3.8

-38%

Gesamt

69

91

11

-22

336

11:12

17

0

5.4

-14%

Endpoint Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

29

13

6

+16

123

3:1

10

1

9.2

+55%

19

15

6

+4

91

5:2

5

0

6.9

+14%

18

13

5

+5

83

1:1

6

0

6.6

+26%

14

13

4

+1

62

1:3

4

1

5.7

-8%

11

15

1

-4

49

2:4

1

1

5.0

-16%

Gesamt

91

69

22

+22

408

12:11

26

3

6.7

+14%

Teamvorteil Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Sangal vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team

Endpoint on Inferno Analysis

Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Endpoint on Inferno were Thomas, who contributed 29 kills, and CRUC1AL, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9390 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sangal on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sangal, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sangal on Inferno included imoRR, who contributed 18 kills, and MAJ3R, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7732 total damage, Sangal couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum