0 Kommentare
63
80
18
-17
366
7:13
14
2
Anubis5.5
+8%
Teams Vorteil
Punktzahl
6.6
5.5
Anubis1
Gewinn Runden
13
7
Anubis6
Tötungen
80
63
Anubis17
Schaden
8.5K
7.33K
Anubis1170
Ökonomie
346.45K
323.9K
Anubis22550
LeistungenMatch
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:26s01:27s
AK47 Kills auf der Karte
136.6606
AK47 Schaden (avg/round)
63.725.3
Flash Dauer auf der Karte (sec)
01:12s00:38s
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
1914.8354
GLOCK Kills auf der Karte
41.4429
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
18.93.9
Öko gewinnt Vollkauf
1
Spieler Punktzahl (round)
35491011
Spieler Punktzahl (round)
34871011
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Inferno
83%
Anubis
83%
Overpass
73%
Vertigo
56%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
38%
Ancient
0%
Letzte 5 Karten
Inferno
83%
6
6
Anubis
83%
6
4
Overpass
73%
11
1
Vertigo
56%
9
8
Nuke
50%
8
3
Mirage
38%
8
1
Ancient
0%
0
21
Letzte 5 Karten
Inferno
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Overpass
0%
1
2
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Nuke
0%
1
1
Mirage
0%
0
3
Ancient
0%
0
1
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Vergangene Spiele
- wwwll
- ll
Info
Match analysis of Rooster vs iM Apartments by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Rooster and iM Apartments, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Rooster. The MVP of this match was nettik.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Rooster were nettik contributed 23 kills and TjP contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8496 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Rooster held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
iM Apartments analytics
The team iM Apartments managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for iM Apartments were InfrequeNt contributed 16 kills and 942r contributed 15 kills. 7326 of total damage by iM Apartments could not prevent Rooster from securing the victory
On the defensive side, iM Apartments struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare