RED Canids Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

14

14

5

0

74

1:1

5

1

6.2

-2%

15

18

6

-3

78

1:4

4

0

5.8

0%

12

12

2

0

53

1:2

3

0

5.4

-17%

12

14

2

-2

54

1:1

4

1

5.3

-17%

14

18

7

-4

76

2:8

3

0

5.2

-10%

Gesamt

67

76

22

-9

335

6:16

19

2

5.6

-9%

Sharks Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

MVP

22

11

3

+11

99

5:2

5

2

8.2

+23%

15

16

11

-1

86

5:1

4

0

6.7

+5%

13

12

8

+1

71

0:0

3

0

5.8

-6%

10

15

5

-5

58

4:2

2

0

5.3

-18%

13

13

4

0

38

2:1

4

0

5.2

-21%

Gesamt

73

67

31

+6

352

16:6

18

2

6.2

-3%

Teamvorteil Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of RED Canids vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

Sharks on Inferno Analysis

Sharks demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sharks on Inferno were doc, who contributed 22 kills, and Gafolo, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7737 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


RED Canids on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for RED Canids, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for RED Canids on Inferno included venomzera, who contributed 14 kills, and drop, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7367 total damage, RED Canids couldn't prevent Sharks from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, RED Canids struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum