0 Kommentare
99
87
28
+12
388
12:16
22
1
Ancient6.3
+4%
LeistungenMatch
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Aufstellungen
Aufstellung
Stellvertreter
Starter
Stellvertreter
Stellvertreter
Stellvertreter
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Vertigo
50%
Dust II
40%
Mirage
35%
Ancient
32%
Nuke
21%
Inferno
20%
Overpass
0%
Letzte 5 Karten
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Dust II
60%
10
0
Mirage
60%
5
1
Ancient
57%
7
0
Nuke
46%
13
1
Inferno
0%
0
1
Overpass
0%
2
0
Letzte 5 Karten
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Dust II
100%
2
0
Mirage
25%
4
0
Ancient
25%
4
0
Nuke
25%
4
0
Inferno
20%
5
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Info
Match analysis of QUAZAR vs SHIPACHI by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between QUAZAR and SHIPACHI, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by QUAZAR. The MVP of this match was fenvicious.
QUAZAR analytics
The team QUAZAR secured 0 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for QUAZAR were fenvicious contributed 21 kills and Shady contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10860 overall damage.
On the defensive side, QUAZAR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SHIPACHI analytics
The team SHIPACHI managed to secure 28 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SHIPACHI were lanqq contributed 23 kills and Brilliance contributed 20 kills. 9796 of total damage by SHIPACHI could not prevent QUAZAR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SHIPACHI struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare