Permitta Anzeigetafel Mirage (M3)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

13

13

4

0

87

4:3

2

0

6.3

+1%

15

11

2

+4

72

0:0

3

0

6.3

+3%

12

14

3

-2

73

4:1

2

0

5.9

-4%

13

12

2

+1

61

1:0

3

0

5.7

-7%

8

12

3

-4

54

2:4

2

0

4.7

-13%

Gesamt

61

62

14

-1

348

11:8

12

0

5.8

-4%

CPH Wolves Anzeigetafel Mirage (M3)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

18

13

4

+5

107

1:0

8

0

7.4

+23%

14

12

0

+2

67

1:0

3

2

6.6

+12%

10

11

4

-1

62

1:1

3

1

5.8

-5%

10

14

4

-4

59

2:4

2

0

5.1

-18%

10

12

3

-2

58

3:6

3

0

5.0

-5%

Gesamt

62

62

15

0

353

8:11

19

3

6.0

+2%

Teamvorteil Mirage (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Permitta vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team

CPH Wolves on Mirage Analysis

CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CPH Wolves on Mirage were Fessor, who contributed 18 kills, and Tapewaare, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 6704 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Mirage, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Permitta on Mirage Analysis

Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for Permitta, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Permitta on Mirage included bnox, who contributed 13 kills, and DGL, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6612 total damage, Permitta couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Mirage


On the defensive side of Mirage, Permitta struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum