0 Kommentare
39
72
9
-33
298
6:10
10
1
-27%
Teamvorteil Vertigo (M2)
Datensätze Vertigo
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
GLOCK Kills auf der Karte
31.4456
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
13.34
USP Schaden (avg/round)
19.84.7
Tec-9 Kills auf der Karte
21.3023
Deagle Kills auf der Karte
31.6672
Deagle Schaden (avg/round)
16.15.4
USP Schaden (avg/round)
13.44.7
Galil Kills auf der Karte
31.8171
HE Schaden (avg/round)
14.43.4
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
164
Info
Map Analysis of Passion UA vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Vertigo Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Vertigo were jackasmo, who contributed 17 kills, and ZeRRoFIX, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 7535 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Vertigo included simke, who contributed 10 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4773 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare