0 Kommentare
86
109
26
-23
335
12:17
17
7
-20%
Teamvorteil Inferno (M1)
Aufstellungen
Aufstellung
Aufstellung
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Vertigo
73%
Anubis
67%
Ancient
62%
Mirage
51%
Inferno
50%
Dust II
47%
Nuke
0%
Letzte 5 Karten
Vertigo
73%
41
8
Anubis
67%
61
6
Ancient
62%
61
15
Mirage
51%
63
7
Inferno
50%
36
16
Dust II
47%
30
23
Nuke
0%
0
72
Letzte 5 Karten
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Vergangene Spiele
- wlllw
- lll
Info
Map Analysis of Passion UA vs Looking For Org by the Bo3.gg Team
Looking For Org on Inferno Analysis
Looking For Org demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 17 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Looking For Org on Inferno were atoom_, who contributed 19 kills, and 1337Majster, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10057 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Looking For Org held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Passion UA on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Passion UA, as they managed to secure 12 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Passion UA on Inferno included Jambo, who contributed 29 kills, and fear, who added 25 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10545 total damage, Passion UA couldn't prevent Looking For Org from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Passion UA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare