0 Kommentare
107
119
38
-12
376
14:16
27
4
+2%
Teamvorteil Ancient (M1)
Datensätze Ancient
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:28s01:25s
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:23s01:25s
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
2714.5022
Flash geblendet auf der Karte (opp)
7628
HE Schaden (avg/round)
11.53.4
Galil Kills auf der Karte
61.8164
Galil Schaden (avg/round)
16.65.9
Galil Schaden (avg/round)
16.85.9
Tec-9 Kills auf der Karte
61.3014
Tec-9 Schaden (avg/round)
12.63.6
Info
Map Analysis of ONi vs Victores Sumus by the Bo3.gg Team
ONi on Ancient Analysis
ONi demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ONi on Ancient were jayy, who contributed 36 kills, and clyd1e, who added 29 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 12505 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, ONi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Victores Sumus on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Victores Sumus, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Victores Sumus on Ancient included ChAmP, who contributed 28 kills, and RaYzEr, who added 24 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11275 total damage, Victores Sumus couldn't prevent ONi from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Victores Sumus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare