Nemiga Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

28

16

0

+12

104

8:1

9

0

8.2

+31%

16

13

4

+3

76

1:1

2

0

6.5

+12%

21

13

0

+8

64

1:1

7

0

6.3

+19%

12

16

7

-4

71

3:1

1

0

5.8

-9%

12

15

10

-3

63

4:3

4

0

5.7

-11%

Gesamt

89

73

21

+16

377

17:7

23

0

6.5

+8%

FAMBIT Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

25

16

6

+9

96

0:1

5

2

7.9

+18%

15

20

5

-5

84

3:2

4

0

6.2

+1%

12

15

3

-3

50

1:2

3

2

5.4

-14%

9

16

3

-7

47

2:2

2

0

4.6

-29%

12

22

6

-10

60

1:10

3

0

4.3

-21%

Gesamt

73

89

23

-16

336

7:17

17

4

5.7

-9%

Teamvorteil Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Nemiga vs FAMBIT by the Bo3.gg Team

Nemiga on Inferno Analysis

Nemiga demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 15 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Nemiga on Inferno were iDISBALANCE, who contributed 28 kills, and BELCHONOKK, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9423 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Nemiga held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


FAMBIT on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for FAMBIT, as they managed to secure 10 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for FAMBIT on Inferno included volt, who contributed 25 kills, and Ping, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8403 total damage, FAMBIT couldn't prevent Nemiga from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, FAMBIT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum