0 Kommentare
67
82
22
-15
352
9:14
16
0
-8%
Teamvorteil Inferno (M2)
Datensätze Inferno
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Tec-9 Schaden (avg/round)
15.83.6
GLOCK Kills auf der Karte
31.4516
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
134.2
Tec-9 Kills auf der Karte
31.3011
Tec-9 Schaden (avg/round)
13.53.6
Molotov Schaden (avg/round)
6.12
HE Schaden (avg/round)
17.63.4
Tec-9 Kills auf der Karte
41.3011
Tec-9 Schaden (avg/round)
12.73.6
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
2214.3232
Info
Map Analysis of Mission Possible vs Passion UA by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Inferno Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Inferno were fear, who contributed 20 kills, and Jambo, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8951 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Mission Possible on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Mission Possible, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Mission Possible on Inferno included Licale, who contributed 19 kills, and birdfromsky, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8104 total damage, Mission Possible couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Mission Possible struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare