0 Kommentare
Teams Vorteil
LeistungenMatch
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:34s01:26s
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:33s01:26s
M4A1 Kills auf der Karte
104.491
Molotov Schaden (avg/round)
9.72
Galil Kills auf der Karte
71.8171
Galil Schaden (avg/round)
34.35.8
GLOCK Kills auf der Karte
41.4456
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
12.94
AK47 Kills auf der Karte
136.5888
Schaden (total/round)
50073
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Mirage
47%
Anubis
31%
Nuke
16%
Inferno
14%
Ancient
7%
Vertigo
2%
Overpass
0%
Letzte 5 Karten
Mirage
70%
10
11
Anubis
53%
15
14
Nuke
58%
12
10
Inferno
67%
9
11
Ancient
78%
18
4
Vertigo
57%
14
9
Overpass
0%
0
36
Letzte 5 Karten
Mirage
23%
30
34
Anubis
84%
31
1
Nuke
42%
33
16
Inferno
53%
19
14
Ancient
71%
24
21
Vertigo
55%
22
15
Overpass
0%
0
71
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Nuke, Vertigo, Inferno, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was exit.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were exit contributed 50 kills and insani contributed 48 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22922 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were doc contributed 38 kills and drg contributed 43 kills. 20999 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare