LeistungenMatch
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Galil Kills auf der Karte
41.8164
Prozentsatz der Kopfschüsse
38%15%
USP Kills auf der Karte
31.6027
Geschwindigkeitsrunde (sec)
00:18s01:55s
Geschwindigkeitsrunde (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Geschwindigkeitsrunde (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Schaden (total/round)
40073
Spieler Punktzahl (round)
45411010
Spieler Punktzahl (round)
36921010
Multi-Tötungen x-
4
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Mirage
75%
Ancient
33%
Anubis
0%
Letzte 5 Karten
Mirage
75%
4
0
Ancient
33%
3
0
Anubis
100%
2
0
Letzte 5 Karten
Mirage
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Vergangene Spiele
Info
Match analysis of MCS vs Waterboarding Fan Club by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MCS and Waterboarding Fan Club, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by MCS. The MVP of this match was Scorchyy.
MCS analytics
The team MCS secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MCS were Scorchyy contributed 21 kills and ogura contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7860 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MCS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Waterboarding Fan Club analytics
The team Waterboarding Fan Club managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Waterboarding Fan Club were sathsea contributed 15 kills and stazzz416 contributed 15 kills. 6198 of total damage by Waterboarding Fan Club could not prevent MCS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Waterboarding Fan Club struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare