MASONIC Anzeigetafel Inferno (M3)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

7

13

1

-6

58

0:4

1

0

4.6

-30%

5

13

3

-8

42

2:1

0

0

4.5

-48%

6

14

1

-8

41

0:2

2

0

4.3

-46%

4

13

2

-9

42

0:3

0

0

3.7

-45%

2

13

0

-11

24

0:2

1

0

3.0

-59%

Gesamt

24

66

7

-42

207

2:12

4

0

4.0

-46%

CPH Wolves Anzeigetafel Inferno (M3)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

19

7

4

+12

129

3:1

7

0

8.9

+47%

11

4

9

+7

108

3:0

3

0

7.7

+30%

15

5

2

+10

84

3:0

4

0

7.5

+36%

13

4

6

+9

84

1:0

3

0

7.5

+60%

8

4

5

+4

69

2:1

1

0

6.0

+5%

Gesamt

66

24

26

+42

473

12:2

18

0

7.5

+36%

Teamvorteil Inferno (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of MASONIC vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team

CPH Wolves on Inferno Analysis

CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 14 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CPH Wolves on Inferno were Szejn, who contributed 19 kills, and Fessor, who added 11 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 6625 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MASONIC on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MASONIC, as they managed to secure 1 out of 14 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MASONIC on Inferno included Zanto, who contributed 7 kills, and Botman, who added 5 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 2903 total damage, MASONIC couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum