MAD Lions Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

27

19

2

+8

95

2:4

7

0

6.6

+14%

24

18

4

+6

79

4:3

5

0

6.4

+7%

18

22

6

-4

81

3:6

4

0

5.8

-4%

15

22

8

-7

57

1:2

4

1

5.2

-15%

10

20

6

-10

46

2:3

1

0

4.5

-28%

Gesamt

94

101

26

-7

357

12:18

21

1

5.7

-5%

fnatic Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

22

17

3

+5

81

3:1

6

0

6.5

+16%

19

17

14

+2

81

4:4

3

0

6.4

+11%

20

22

5

-2

64

6:1

3

0

6.3

-9%

20

22

5

-2

76

4:4

6

0

5.8

+6%

18

16

4

+2

60

1:2

5

1

5.7

-5%

Gesamt

99

94

31

+5

362

18:12

23

1

6.1

+4%

Teamvorteil Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of MAD Lions vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team

fnatic on Inferno Analysis

fnatic demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for fnatic on Inferno were flusha, who contributed 22 kills, and JW, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10860 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MAD Lions on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MAD Lions, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MAD Lions on Inferno included refrezh, who contributed 27 kills, and acoR, who added 24 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10716 total damage, MAD Lions couldn't prevent fnatic from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MAD Lions struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum