0 Kommentare
Teams Vorteil
Punktzahl
6.2
5.9
Mirage0.3
Gewinn Runden
19
17
Mirage2
Tötungen
125
118
Mirage7
Schaden
13.52K
13.32K
Mirage197
Ökonomie
841.4K
814.45K
Mirage26950
LeistungenMatch
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Vertigo
83%
Dust II
x
67%
Ancient
64%
Overpass
50%
Inferno
48%
Mirage
17%
Nuke
6%
Letzte 5 Karten
Vertigo
0%
4
2
Dust II
67%
6
0
Ancient
0%
1
1
Overpass
0%
1
4
Inferno
25%
4
5
Mirage
50%
6
3
Nuke
54%
13
1
Letzte 5 Karten
Vertigo
83%
6
2
Dust II
0%
1
12
Ancient
64%
22
0
Overpass
50%
4
8
Inferno
73%
15
4
Mirage
67%
12
3
Nuke
60%
20
0
Info
Match analysis of xDDDD vs PALOMA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between xDDDD and PALOMA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by xDDDD. The MVP of this match was Polt.
xDDDD analytics
The team xDDDD secured 36 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for xDDDD were Polt contributed 33 kills and PASHANOJ contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13516 overall damage.
On the defensive side, xDDDD held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PALOMA analytics
The team PALOMA managed to secure 0 out of 36 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PALOMA were Layner contributed 30 kills and OLIMP contributed 22 kills. 13319 of total damage by PALOMA could not prevent xDDDD from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PALOMA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare