Beendet
HAVU
2 - 1
hREDS
Vollständige

0 Kommentare

HAVU Anzeigetafel Inferno (M3)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

23

15

5

+8

89

6:4

5

1

7.1

+15%

20

15

5

+5

75

4:2

5

0

6.6

+6%

22

20

5

+2

75

3:3

4

0

6.4

+16%

18

13

7

+5

78

2:3

5

0

6.2

+11%

13

12

7

+1

53

0:1

2

1

5.6

-6%

Gesamt

96

75

29

+21

370

15:13

21

2

6.4

+8%

hREDS Anzeigetafel Inferno (M3)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

17

20

4

-3

68

3:1

3

0

5.9

-6%

18

22

4

-4

74

3:4

4

0

5.7

0%

15

19

3

-4

66

4:5

2

1

5.5

-13%

12

15

8

-3

56

1:2

4

1

5.4

-11%

11

20

3

-9

52

2:3

3

0

4.6

-23%

Gesamt

73

96

22

-23

316

13:15

16

2

5.4

-10%

Teamvorteil Inferno (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of HAVU vs hREDS by the Bo3.gg Team

HAVU on Inferno Analysis

HAVU demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for HAVU on Inferno were xseveN, who contributed 23 kills, and Aerial, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10354 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, HAVU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


hREDS on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for hREDS, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for hREDS on Inferno included LYNXi, who contributed 17 kills, and eDi, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8859 total damage, hREDS couldn't prevent HAVU from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, hREDS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum