DMS Anzeigetafel Anubis (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

26

15

6

+11

137

2:2

7

0

8.5

+48%

12

11

4

+1

73

0:1

2

0

5.7

+7%

16

16

4

0

64

3:4

4

0

5.6

+3%

9

16

7

-7

52

2:1

1

0

4.9

-28%

9

16

1

-7

37

2:5

3

0

4.2

-24%

Gesamt

72

74

22

-2

362

9:13

17

0

5.8

+1%

Zero Tenacity Anzeigetafel Anubis (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

21

13

5

+8

103

6:3

6

0

7.8

+28%

13

11

2

+2

63

1:0

3

0

6.0

+6%

16

17

3

-1

80

4:5

4

0

5.9

-7%

12

15

1

-3

67

0:0

4

1

5.9

-9%

12

16

4

-4

66

2:1

3

0

5.6

-13%

Gesamt

74

72

15

+2

379

13:9

20

1

6.2

+1%

Teamvorteil Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of DMS vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were brutmonster, who contributed 21 kills, and aVN, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8338 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


DMS on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for DMS, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for DMS on Anubis included kAlash, who contributed 26 kills, and sm3t, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7963 total damage, DMS couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum