0 Kommentare
66
30
21
+36
487
10:4
21
1
+37%
Teamvorteil Ancient (M0)
Datensätze Ancient
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:28s01:23s
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:22s01:23s
M4A1 Kills auf der Karte
94.306
M4A1 Schaden (avg/round)
64.916.3
USP Schaden (avg/round)
14.34.9
M4A1 Kills auf der Karte
74.306
M4A1 Schaden (avg/round)
63.616.3
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
13.64.2
Geworfene Blendgranaten
21.2597
Schaden (total/round)
38373
Info
Map Analysis of Fated Rise vs Blaze Warriors by the Bo3.gg Team
Fated Rise on Ancient Analysis
Fated Rise demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 14 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Fated Rise on Ancient were Cate, who contributed 15 kills, and BZA, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 6812 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Fated Rise held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Blaze Warriors on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Blaze Warriors, as they managed to secure 1 out of 14 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Blaze Warriors on Ancient included pms, who contributed 9 kills, and ryu, who added 6 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3900 total damage, Blaze Warriors couldn't prevent Fated Rise from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Blaze Warriors struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare