0 Kommentare
43
73
18
-30
323
4:10
12
0
-21%
69
48
30
+21
432
11:5
17
2
+22%
Teamvorteil Inferno (M2)
Datensätze Inferno
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
GLOCK Kills auf der Karte
31.4429
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
11.93.9
USP Kills auf der Karte
31.6107
USP Schaden (avg/round)
15.94.7
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
1514.8354
Galil Kills auf der Karte
41.8161
Galil Schaden (avg/round)
23.15.7
Flash geblendet auf der Karte (opp)
4729
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
11.33.9
HE Tötungen auf der Karte
21.1235
Info
Map Analysis of ex-ENEIDA vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team
CYBERSHOKE on Inferno Analysis
CYBERSHOKE demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Inferno were FenomeN, who contributed 16 kills, and Fen2k, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7336 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ex-ENEIDA on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ex-ENEIDA, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ex-ENEIDA on Inferno included byr9, who contributed 15 kills, and kensizor, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5494 total damage, ex-ENEIDA couldn't prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, ex-ENEIDA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare