0 Kommentare
Teamvorteil Inferno (M1)
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Dust II
100%
Vertigo
40%
Nuke
38%
Overpass
25%
Ancient
21%
Inferno
13%
Anubis
8%
Mirage
1%
Letzte 5 Karten
Dust II
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
1
14
Nuke
38%
8
5
Overpass
25%
4
6
Ancient
50%
10
5
Inferno
56%
18
2
Anubis
25%
4
3
Mirage
44%
18
3
Letzte 5 Karten
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
40%
5
2
Nuke
0%
0
10
Overpass
50%
10
0
Ancient
29%
7
2
Inferno
69%
13
0
Anubis
33%
3
3
Mirage
43%
7
5
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Vergangene Spiele
- llwlw
- wlwll
Info
Map Analysis of Enterprise vs Katuna by the Bo3.gg Team
Katuna on Inferno Analysis
Katuna demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Katuna on Inferno were lightdice, who contributed 23 kills, and hybrid, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11164 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Katuna held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Enterprise on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Enterprise, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Enterprise on Inferno included M1key, who contributed 25 kills, and Pechyn, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10424 total damage, Enterprise couldn't prevent Katuna from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Enterprise struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare