EC Kyiv Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

16

14

3

+2

82

4:3

4

0

6.5

+12%

13

14

7

-1

78

2:0

2

0

6.2

-1%

14

12

6

+2

59

3:1

3

0

6.1

-5%

8

14

3

-6

58

0:6

2

0

4.4

-20%

8

15

2

-7

44

1:2

1

0

4.3

-28%

Gesamt

59

69

21

-10

320

10:12

12

0

5.5

-8%

fnatic Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

16

9

2

+7

70

3:2

4

0

6.6

+18%

16

14

1

+2

64

3:3

4

0

6.3

-1%

15

11

4

+4

65

1:2

3

0

6.3

+9%

13

12

5

+1

79

2:2

3

0

6.2

-1%

9

14

8

-5

60

3:1

1

1

6.0

-15%

Gesamt

69

60

20

+9

338

12:10

15

1

6.3

+2%

Teamvorteil Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Kyiv vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team

fnatic on Inferno Analysis

fnatic demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for fnatic on Inferno were Peppzor, who contributed 16 kills, and KRIMZ, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7369 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EC Kyiv on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EC Kyiv, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Inferno included Smash, who contributed 16 kills, and uQlutzavr, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7042 total damage, EC Kyiv couldn't prevent fnatic from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Kyiv struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum