0 Kommentare
Teamvorteil Mirage (M1)
Aufstellungen
Aufstellung
Aufstellung
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Nuke
56%
Dust II
50%
Inferno
45%
Vertigo
43%
Ancient
22%
Mirage
11%
Anubis
9%
Letzte 5 Karten
Nuke
56%
34
10
Dust II
100%
2
41
Inferno
45%
29
12
Vertigo
43%
21
11
Ancient
55%
93
3
Mirage
61%
66
5
Anubis
52%
52
6
Letzte 5 Karten
Nuke
0%
2
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Ancient
33%
6
0
Mirage
50%
10
0
Anubis
43%
7
0
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Vergangene Spiele
- wwlwl
- lwwll
Info
Map Analysis of CPH Wolves vs HyperSpirit by the Bo3.gg Team
CPH Wolves on Mirage Analysis
CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CPH Wolves on Mirage were aNdu, who contributed 15 kills, and MAGILA, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 7223 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
HyperSpirit on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for HyperSpirit, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for HyperSpirit on Mirage included kritik, who contributed 15 kills, and welnic, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6297 total damage, HyperSpirit couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, HyperSpirit struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare