CPH Wolves Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

19

17

3

+2

92

1:1

7

0

6.5

+8%

16

16

3

0

77

3:2

5

0

6.4

+10%

16

19

2

-3

68

2:6

3

0

5.4

+1%

10

13

2

-3

41

1:1

3

1

4.9

-20%

7

16

8

-9

55

2:4

0

1

4.7

-28%

Gesamt

68

81

18

-13

334

9:14

18

2

5.6

-6%

FAVBET Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

17

16

5

+1

84

7:2

5

0

7.0

+6%

18

13

4

+5

86

3:1

6

0

7.0

+16%

16

14

3

+2

80

2:2

5

0

6.5

-1%

15

12

5

+3

56

2:1

3

0

5.9

+1%

15

13

4

+2

73

0:3

2

0

5.8

+4%

Gesamt

81

68

21

+13

379

14:9

21

0

6.4

+5%

Teamvorteil Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of CPH Wolves vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team

FAVBET on Inferno Analysis

FAVBET demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for FAVBET on Inferno were mAriX, who contributed 17 kills, and Smash, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8713 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


CPH Wolves on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for CPH Wolves, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for CPH Wolves on Inferno included Szejn, who contributed 19 kills, and sense, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7681 total damage, CPH Wolves couldn't prevent FAVBET from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, CPH Wolves struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum