Beendet
Vollständige

0 Kommentare

Case Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

23

19

4

+4

80

3:2

7

0

6.6

0%

23

16

9

+7

96

3:6

4

0

6.6

+27%

24

20

8

+4

81

4:3

5

0

6.3

+9%

16

23

10

-7

73

2:1

4

0

5.3

-9%

19

19

5

0

63

1:4

3

0

5.2

0%

Gesamt

105

97

36

+8

392

13:16

23

0

6.0

+5%

Flamengo Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

27

22

4

+5

93

6:4

4

1

7.2

+36%

20

22

5

-2

77

3:3

6

2

6.2

-5%

17

24

14

-7

84

4:0

4

0

6.2

-7%

17

22

8

-5

68

2:5

4

0

5.3

-14%

13

20

10

-7

59

1:1

1

0

5.1

-19%

Gesamt

94

110

41

-16

381

16:13

19

3

6.0

-2%

Teamvorteil Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Case vs Flamengo by the Bo3.gg Team

Case on Inferno Analysis

Case demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Case on Inferno were RCF, who contributed 23 kills, and zmb, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11364 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Case held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Flamengo on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Flamengo, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Flamengo on Inferno included LUCAS1, who contributed 27 kills, and ALLE, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11053 total damage, Flamengo couldn't prevent Case from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Flamengo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum