Beendet
1
Vollständige

0 Kommentare

9 Pandas Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

5

5

1

0

83

0:1

2

1

7.4

+5%

5

6

1

-1

108

1:1

1

0

7.4

+5%

3

5

1

-2

82

0:0

1

0

6.0

-16%

3

6

1

-3

59

1:1

1

0

5.4

-37%

4

6

0

-2

74

0:1

0

0

5.4

-22%

Gesamt

20

28

4

-8

405

2:4

5

1

6.3

-13%

ECLOT Anzeigetafel Inferno (M2)

+/-

RUNDEN PUNKTZAHL

7

4

3

+3

112

0:0

2

1

8.9

+41%

6

4

4

+2

108

2:0

2

0

8.1

+27%

6

3

3

+3

129

1:1

1

0

7.8

+41%

5

5

1

0

87

1:1

2

0

6.2

+3%

4

4

0

0

35

0:0

0

1

5.5

-14%

Gesamt

28

20

11

+8

470

4:2

7

2

7.3

+20%

Teamvorteil Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of 9 Pandas vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team

ECLOT on Inferno Analysis

ECLOT demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 4 out of 6 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ECLOT on Inferno were Dytor, who contributed 7 kills, and FORSYY, who added 6 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 2818 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


9 Pandas on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for 9 Pandas, as they managed to secure 2 out of 6 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for 9 Pandas on Inferno included iDISBALANCE, who contributed 5 kills, and glowiing, who added 5 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 2430 total damage, 9 Pandas couldn't prevent ECLOT from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, 9 Pandas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum