0 Comentários
Escalação
escalação
escalação
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Icebox
100%
Haven
100%
Fracture
67%
Bind
67%
Ascent
50%
Split
50%
Lotus
50%
Sunset
50%
Pearl
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Icebox
0%
1
Haven
0%
0
Fracture
0%
0
Bind
0%
0
Ascent
0%
1
Split
0%
0
Lotus
100%
1
Sunset
0%
0
Pearl
0%
0
Últimos 5 mapas
Icebox
100%
1
Haven
100%
3
Fracture
67%
3
Bind
67%
6
Ascent
50%
2
Split
50%
4
Lotus
50%
4
Sunset
50%
2
Pearl
0%
1
Info
Match analysis of Ghost Gaming GC vs FlyQuest RED by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Ghost Gaming GC and FlyQuest RED, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Icebox, Lotus, Ascent, and victory was secured by FlyQuest RED. The MVP of this match was BOT9.
FlyQuest RED analytics
The team FlyQuest RED secured 38 out of 70 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Icebox, Ascent. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FlyQuest RED were BOT9 contributed 72 kills and aluvily contributed 57 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 47138 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FlyQuest RED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Ghost Gaming GC analytics
The team Ghost Gaming GC managed to secure 32 out of 70 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Ghost Gaming GC were vanitas contributed 53 kills and KETARYS contributed 51 kills. 47726 of total damage by Ghost Gaming GC could not prevent FlyQuest RED from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Ghost Gaming GC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários