0 Comentários
Escalação
escalação
escalação
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- VlllV
- lVVVV
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Bind
100%
Abyss
100%
Ascent
75%
Split
67%
Haven
60%
Fracture
25%
Pearl
20%
Lotus
17%
Últimos 5 mapas
Bind
100%
3
Abyss
100%
1
Ascent
100%
1
Split
33%
3
Haven
40%
5
Fracture
75%
4
Pearl
20%
5
Lotus
33%
3
Últimos 5 mapas
Bind
0%
0
Abyss
0%
0
Ascent
25%
4
Split
100%
1
Haven
100%
1
Fracture
100%
1
Pearl
0%
0
Lotus
50%
2
Info
Match analysis of Enterprise Esports vs ACEGEAR TEMPEST by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Enterprise Esports and ACEGEAR TEMPEST, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ascent, and victory was secured by Enterprise Esports. The MVP of this match was Kiles.
Enterprise Esports analytics
The team Enterprise Esports secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ascent. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Enterprise Esports were Kiles contributed 19 kills and Doma contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13443 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Enterprise Esports held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ACEGEAR TEMPEST analytics
The team ACEGEAR TEMPEST managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ACEGEAR TEMPEST were Szalony contributed 17 kills and ajmerito contributed 16 kills. 13453 of total damage by ACEGEAR TEMPEST could not prevent Enterprise Esports from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ACEGEAR TEMPEST struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários