0 Komentarze
80
57
21
+23
421
11:9
19
4
+17%
Przewaga drużyn Mirage (M2)
Rekordy Mirage
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Zabójstwa za pomocą GLOCK na mapie
31.4429
Obrażenia od GLOCK (avg/round)
153.9
Zabójstwa za pomocą Galil kna mapie
41.8161
Obrażenia od Galil (avg/round)
18.45.7
Obrażenia od USP (avg/round)
194.7
Obrażenia od GLOCK (avg/round)
16.73.9
Eco wygrywa pełny zakup
1
Wynik gracza (runda)
35021011
Wynik gracza (runda)
43471011
Obrażenia (total/round)
39473
Informacja
Map Analysis of Passion UA vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Mirage Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Mirage were nEMANHA, who contributed 20 kills, and brutmonster, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 8419 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Passion UA on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for Passion UA, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Passion UA on Mirage included jackasmo, who contributed 16 kills, and s-chilla, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6503 total damage, Passion UA couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, Passion UA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze