2 Komentarze
Przewaga drużyn Inferno (M2)
Rekordy Inferno
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Zabójstwa HE na mapie
31.121
Zabójstwa za pomocą USP na mapie
31.6027
Obrażenia od USP (avg/round)
18.74.8
Zabójstwa za pomocą Galil kna mapie
41.8164
Obrażenia od Galil (avg/round)
23.25.9
Czas trwania oślepienia flashem na mapie (sec)
01:03s00:36s
Czas trwania oślepienia flashem na mapie (sec)
00:52s00:36s
Obrażenia od USP (avg/round)
13.34.8
Zabójstwa za pomocą GLOCK na mapie
21.4482
Obrażenia od GLOCK (avg/round)
16.64.1
Informacja
Map Analysis of Passion UA vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team
FAVBET on Inferno Analysis
FAVBET demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for FAVBET on Inferno were mAriX, who contributed 18 kills, and t3ns1on, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7085 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Passion UA on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Passion UA, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Passion UA on Inferno included jackasmo, who contributed 11 kills, and Jambo, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4078 total damage, Passion UA couldn't prevent FAVBET from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Passion UA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
2 Komentarze