0 Komentarze
Przewaga drużyn Anubis (M1)
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Inferno
44%
Mirage
e
42%
Dust II
40%
Vertigo
13%
Ancient
7%
Nuke
0%
Anubis
0%
Ostatnie 5 map
Inferno
44%
36
19
Mirage
58%
59
10
Dust II
40%
20
17
Vertigo
63%
38
9
Ancient
60%
75
4
Nuke
0%
0
71
Anubis
64%
58
10
Ostatnie 5 map
Inferno
0%
3
2
Mirage
100%
1
3
Dust II
0%
1
0
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Ancient
53%
17
1
Nuke
0%
1
0
Anubis
64%
11
0
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- lwwll
- wllll
Informacja
Map Analysis of Passion UA vs esmagaB by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Anubis Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Anubis were Jambo, who contributed 25 kills, and jackasmo, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8943 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
esmagaB on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for esmagaB, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for esmagaB on Anubis included rafaxF, who contributed 20 kills, and aragornN, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7668 total damage, esmagaB couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, esmagaB struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze